![]() Observa-se que há variações na literatura no que se refere aos componentes dos ecossistemas de empreendedorismo em questão, à metodologia proposta e à abordagem geográfica. Nesse sentido, o presente trabalho objetiva, a partir de uma revisão da literatura, propor uma reflexão sobre as métricas de ecossistemas de empreendedorismo e as abordagens utilizadas para a elaboração das mesmas. A fim de que essas políticas sejam desenhadas e monitoradas, é essencial mensurar como evoluem e interagem os diferentes componentes dos ecossistemas de empreendedorismo, através da construção de métricas adequadas. atuação de formuladores de políticas públicas. Diante de evidências empíricas encontradas na literatura a respeito da importância do empreendedorismo na prosperidade econômica, e na geração de emprego e renda, políticas públicas de apoio e estímulo ao empreendedorismo vêm sendo objeto da. View full-textĪ abordagem de ecossistemas de empreendedorismo é recente e tem obtido, nos últimos anos, grande atenção de acadêmicos e formuladores de políticas públicas. Se concluye que el ecosistema emprendedor costarricense posee en términos generales un estado regular (2.03 en escala de 1 a 5). El trabajo aporta originalidad al evaluar de forma integrada cinco modelos diferentes, aunque posee como limitación que los datos disponibles en cada modelo son de diferentes momentos en el tiempo. En los resultados se aporta además una serie de oportunidades de mejora en lo refe-rente a la coordinación de sus actores y la generación de acciones para fortalecer los componentes más débiles. muestran algunos aspectos negativos del ecosistema emprendedor como el financiamiento y la investigación y desarrollo, así como otros medianamente positivos como la infraestructura. ![]() Esos cinco modelos juntos contienen sesenta y seis variables, las cuales son armo-nizadas mediante ocho grandes categorías. La metodología se basa en un análisis integrado de cinco modelos diferentes de valoración y clasificación de ecosistemas emprendedores. Resumen El objetivo de este artículo es evaluar el ecosistema emprendedor en Costa Rica al segundo semestre de 2018. These concepts are then illustrated with three case studies of universities that have engaged with partners in local economies to launch new industries, fostering entrepreneurship, and revitalize neighborhoods. We use this framework to analyze the role of the university throughout the ecosystem lifecycle. We propose the dynamic capabilities framework to guide how universities might manage their innovation ecosystems. Unfortunately, the flexible and entrepreneurial management of universities required to make this model work has virtually been ignored in the academic literature. Such models highlight the boundary-spanning roles of universities and provide a predetermined list of actions universities could take to strengthen their ecosystem. Models such as the "Triple Helix" have been advanced to frame the assessment of interactions among academia, industry, and governments that may foster economic development. In addition to developing human capital and advancing technology, they are increasingly expected to participate as economic development partners with industry and local, state, and national governments. Universities play an important role in innovation ecosystems. ![]() An increasing regional presence of large biotech firms in the past 5 years, a highly active and diverse start-up sector, increasing merger and acquisition activity, and declines in regional public funding for medical and clinical trials all suggest a transition of entrepreneurial activity in the region from a dynamic driven by federal research spillovers to one increasingly driven by private sector actors. ![]() We find that the biotechnology cluster in the National Capital Region entered a “reorientation” stage in the early 2000s, building up stored energy, capital, and connectedness in non-research-oriented activities. This application constitutes an initial attempt at mapping the dynamics of an industry cluster within the adaptive life cycle of a wider regional ecosystem. We apply this framework to study the US National Capital Region’s localized cluster of biotechnology-related entrepreneurship by building our analysis around a set of indicators of ecosystem vitality proposed by Stangler and Bell-Masterson (2015). We propose an empirical framework for assessing the vibrancy and trajectory of regional entrepreneurial ecosystems. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |